Another gym sent to me by Roy:

Sarah Bertram, Oregon’s own superstar weightlifter, got 6th place in the Pan American games on Friday. 

Bertram completed her first two snatches of 85kg and 88kg, but just
missed her 90kg attempt at a new personal record.  The reigning Senior
National Champion, Bertram was in fourth place following the snatch
portion of the competition.

In the clean and jerk, Bertram successfully lifted 104kg and 107kg
during her first two attempts, but missed her final lift of 109kg. 

4 of the Worlds Strongest Men (Phil Pfister, Travis Ortmyer, Dave Ostlund and Derek Poundstone) get caught in an elevator … the beginning of a bad joke?  Nope, just a funny Youtube vid.

Apparently, they ended up climbing out.  Lesson … if you have 4 guys weighing close to 300 pounds with you, use the stairs! 

Check out this home-movie someone put up of the 2009 Worlds Strongest Man.  Especially wild is the one arm clean and press competition between Mariusz and Phil Phister

The NSCA (National Strength and Conditioning Association) has decided to censor Mike Boyle by uninviting him from their recent conference as a speaker.

He gives 3 reasons for why this might be the case. 

1- My views on lower body training and aerobic conditioning are frowned on by members of the selection committee. I really hope this is not the reason. This would be the highest degree of censorship.

2- I have openly criticized the NSCA on my website. Guilty as charged. I did write a strengthcoach.com forum post critical of the certification processs and I stand by what I said. ” the NSCA certification test is the opinion of certain members of the NSCA committee. If you want to pass, simply study the answers in the book”. The NSCA certification also lacks any practical experience component allowing anyone to be a CSCS with no actual on-the-floor experience. I have said that before and I will say it again as it is true. I also stated “The NSCA’s primary method of revenue generation is through the selling of certification”. Does the NSCA have another major revenue method I am unaware of?

3- I have been unprofessional in my criticism of other practitioners. I think this part is clearly unjustified. I have openly criticised concepts and ideas espoused by other professionals. I have often done it while the people whose ideas were being discussed were in the room. Anyone who has seen me speak knows that I always make the point of distinguishing between disagree and dislike. I don’t think it is healthy to adopt an attitude of never criticising another speaker or writer. We are all big boys. If we choose to write articles, speak at conferences and sell educational products then we should expect critques.

Generally I could care less if a private organization wants to discriminate against people it disagrees with.  Private organizations are not the federal government and it is not their job to “be fair”. Free speech requirements are only applicable to the government.

But, NSCA has tried long and hard to make itself the de facto official certification body of the strength and conditioning community.  With that comes a government-like responsibility to hear all sides of the various arguments in the field and to avoid having a “view” – at least as much as is possible.

That said, I’m not sure I want the NSCA to be this official body.  Up until now, it has been common practice to tow the party line when it came to the NSCA.  Mike Boyle was one of the very few who criticized them (publically) on a number of points.  By “banning” him from this conference, maybe it will lead enough of his followers to get angry enough to rise up against the establishment. 

Who knows.  Just a thought.  While it sucks for Boyle and those people who were planning on going mainly to see him talk, I think on balance it was a good thing that could result in positive changes in the long run. 

The NSCA just bit one of the hands that feeds.

Here’s a Sumo Match between my main man Kotooshu (the Bulgarian) and the Mongolian Harumafuji.  Both men are Ozeki, but neither are doing all that well in this Basho. 

It is an understatement to say that Olympic weightlifters are obsessed with Bulgarians.  No, not the people, or the great food (my Step Dad is Bulgarian, I can testify), or the copious consumption of vodka (well … maybe a bit of that). No, Olympic weightlifters are obsessed with Bulgarian weightlifters, and even more so with their previous head coach Ivan Abadjiev.

Much of this obsession culminates in an attempt to use the ‘Bulgarian method’ of training in some manner on their own.  The problem with this is two-fold.  First, it is hard to pin down just what the method was in the first place that catapulted a tiny nation of only 8 million people into weightlifting superstardom and kept them there for decades.  Second, whatever the exact methods used by the Bulgarians, we do know that they were far out of the zone of practicality for most Americans.

That said, it is still instructive to first evaluate just what the Bulgarian system was actually like.  And then to find a way to incorporate some of the best of it into your training. 

While you can’t train exactly like a Bulgarian, you CAN get much stronger applying some of the same principles upon which their system was founded.

Also, this is my own interpretation of the stuff that is out there about the Bulgarian system. As I mention below, there is little to go on, so we’re forced into the position of interpreters of scarce data (like paleontologists).  Not enviable, but inevitable.

[side note:  It is a fact that the Bulgarians – along with nearly ever other dominant country in sports – used a shite-ton of steroids and other drugs.  Abadjiev hasn’t shied away from this fact, though he calls them (cryptically) ‘recovery agents’.  The two main reasons you CANNOT train like a Bulgarian are: 1) you don’t have the time, this was their job; 2) you aren’t on a bunch of drugs that enable you to recover so fast.  I’m not going to make this a steroids post.  I still believe you can gain a lot from a modified Bulgarian approach.  But, it would be naive to pretend that steroids didn’t play a big part.  That said, most of the countries have their lifters on steroids, so the Bulgarians were hardly unique in this respect.  In other words, drugs were a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for their success.]

What Is the Bulgarian ‘System’?

Sadly, Ivan Abadjiev has never written a book outlining precisely how he trained his lifters (in the late 90’s there was talk, but it never came to fruition).  And none of his lifters have come out with a ‘tell all’ book, either.  We’re left with interviews of Abadjiev and his lifters, a few articles, some writings by those that have spent time with them (e.g. guys like Randall J. Strossen).  It isn’t perfect, but we do have a few things to go on.  See my reference list at the bottom for a few good reads.

Adaptation

The first key principle that we can glean about the Bulgarian system is the principle of Adaptation.  The point is simply that you adapt in direct response to a stimulus.  Different stimuli produce different adaptations.  The adaptations that come from sub-80% lifts are different that the ones that result from >90% lifts. 

The point then, under this idea, is to focus your energy at the top-end weights in training so that you encourage the proper adaptations that are the most sport-specific. 

In a general sense we know this to be true.  How specific we can take it is debatable.  But, on the balance, Abadjiev is on to something. If you want to prepare to lift heavy weights, it makes sense to lift heavy weights.

Specialization

The next principle is Specialization.  Exercises that are not directly related to the sport shouldn’t be relied upon. The thinking is that they don’t result in the right adaptations, for one. But, the other reason is that Olympic weightlifting is one of the most unique sports on the planet.  No other sport requires maximum intensity, high level technique, at such a rapid pace.  It doesn’t matter how good your technique is at 80% or even 95% of max.  All that matters is how good your technique is at 100% of max weights. 

The only way to train yourself to handle yourself with utmost technique at high intensity at max weights is to do just that with the competition lifts themselves.  No exercise can mimic them.  They are your prime strength builders and technique builders.  Add in some front squats and you’re good. 

Abadjiev even dumped the back squat:

"Our athletes do not do any "supportive exercises" they stay with full clean and jerk, snatch, and front squat. We have found that taking back squat out is more effective for the healthy lifter. Sticking with the three lifts named above as the only training for the advanced and healthy lifter…. If the athlete is injured they will do back squat or parts of the lift the full lifts (ie. high pulls, push press, etc…). You must be extremely careful with the stresses you put on your athletes. You must have direct benefits from each exercise because the athlete has limited recovery capacity." IA

Competition Mode

Abadjiev believed that the best training experiences were contests themselves.  He had his lifters in so many contests that they were happening nearly every 3 weeks!  And in the weeks leading into the contests, they were still attacking max weights.  Training sessions mimicked contests – except that they were worse, because you had to take more attempts at weights you missed, not to mention you still had a ton of squatting to do.

Make your training sessions as much like contests as you can in terms of intensity, exercise selection, and reps. And then compete as often as humanly possible. 

Intuitiveness

A point that is often overlooked is the importance in their system of intuition.  Since there is virtually no variety in training at all, it becomes paramount that the lifter learns to interpret what their body is telling them – it’s the only ‘periodization’ available to them.  On days they feel good, they should push it and go for broke.  On days they feel crappy, lay off.   You’ll be back in a few hours anyway.

The other mental point is a total willingness to embrace failure.  Under this system, athletes will miss and miss and miss.  All the time, missing.  They go in, go heavy as hell, and fail.  As time goes on, they fail at higher and higher weights, thereby increasing the weights with which they succeed. 

It is through missing that you learn the character of a lifter.

With intuition, lifters create their own version of periodization:

Lifters might take as little as 1, or as many as 10 attempts at maximum. They might hit a maximum and immediately drop back to 80% before progressing back up (sometimes with minor adjustments in the weights attempted). Alternatively, after one or more maximum attempts they may perform drop down, ‘flushing’ sets at various intensities. Additionally lifters change the order of exercises or repeat exercises within the same session to add extra stimulus where required. Finally, the coach might change the training frequency in a given week to permit greater time for recuperation. These and other variables can be continually adjusted to keep training both mentally and physically stimulating (See Appendix). It should be stressed that Bulgarian lifters utilize daily ‘training’ maximums rather than absolute (best ever) maximums. On a given day, depending on fatigue and arousal levels, these two loads could vary significantly.

[I’m going to refrain from the myriad jokes that could result from the “arousal level” comment!]

Examples of Routines

Most of the time when someone says ‘Bulgarian training’ they mean the following:  Lift as heavy as you can on singles on the classical lifts, 3 times a day, 6 days a week. 

That is a gross oversimplification that leads to some wildly problematic training – and overtraining.  Abadjiev was highly worried about recovery capacity – or more accurately, the lack thereof.  While his lifters had the benefit of ‘recovery agents’ (roids!), constant massage therapy, ice-baths, etc, they still weren’t machines.  No one, even on steroids, can lift like that.  No one.

Instead, there were heavy days/workouts, and lighter workouts.  On the heavy days, one might do ton of lifts at the maximum.  But, on a light day or workout, they may only do power snatches and power cleans and front squats to 70-80%.  Or full lifts, but lighter.

One of the more frequently seen examples is the most basic:

Monday/Wednesday/Friday

9am – 12pm: snatch to heavy single; half-hour break; clean and jerk to heavy single; half hour break; front squat to heavy single.

They may also include back-off sets (singles of course) in the 90% range of whatever the heavy single was. (When I say up to a heavy single, I mean full-on as if it were a contest.  Keep going up till you miss, then try it again.)

3pm to 6pm: same as morning.

9pm: Front squat to heavy single.

Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday

Same as Monday, but only do power versions (or light full versions).  Also, dump the evening front squats.

Sunday

9am: Front squats to heavy single.

Yep, every day – even the Sabbath.  

Another option that I’ve seen is to do only Snatch and Front squats on Mon/Wed/Fri, only Clean and jerk and Front squats on Tue/Thur/Sat, then Front squats on Sunday.  Go heavy when you feel like you can, lighten it up when you have to.  Keep recovery in mind.  (I particularly like this model, it’s intuitive, and basic, and easy to implement.)

How to Use the Bulgarian Ideas to Your Advantage

There are only a few components to juggle when writing a training routine:  exercise selection; sets; reps; volume; load; frequency; and intensity are the main ones.

The Bulgarian training system kept the exercise selection down to a minimum: snatch; clean and jerk; front squat; and sometimes the power versions.  They kept the reps exclusively to singles.  The sets varied depending on how they felt.  The volume (sets x reps) was low. The load (sets x reps x weight lifted) was moderate.  But, the frequency and intensity were both very high. 

The key to the system is high intensity, high frequency, specificity, and an intuitive approach to volume (more sets when feeling good, less when not). 

You can take from that menu what you think will benefit you most. 

Here’s an example of one of my all-time favorite Bulgarian variations for people who can hit the gym often, but not for long each time.

A-day

am/pm: Snatches, Front squats

B-day

am/pm: Clean and Jerks, Front squats.

Alternate these workouts 4 to 6 days a week.  (Workout should take between 20 to 40 minutes.)

Do only singles.  Work up to as heavy a lift as you can on the classical lift for the day, then if you feel good, do some back off singles at 90%.  Front squat to a max-ish weight (remember not to miss!).  Do 1 or 2 back off singles on a good day.

On days you feel strong, you’ll be able to do a lot.  On days you are dragging, let it be.  Just work up to a heavy lift, then front squat whatever you can for a single and go home.  If the crappy days are really crappy, that’s normal.  Don’t feel bad.  That’s part of the program.

You can do the workout only once a day or twice a day, depending on what you have time for, and what your goals are.  It’s a simple and intuitive training routine that most anyone can thrive on. 

Is it realistic for you?  Maybe not.  If you can only come in 3 times a week, you’ll need to make up for the lack of frequency with higher volume in each workout.  And you can’t just do 1 classical lift in each workout  or you’d only be doing it 1 to 2 times a week which isn’t enough. 

If that is you.  Do both lifts all three days, go heavy and hard and finish with back squats.  Same workout every day you come in.  You can progress remarkably far with this.  Go up to something heavy on the classical lift, do some back off sets (2 to 6), move on.   The workouts should be less than an hour and 15 min’s.

The Downsides of the Bulgarian System

There are at least four major downsides to the Bulgarian system.

The first is injury rates.  It is a fact that lifting at the maximum of your ability every day, all year, is not good for you.  It’s hard on your joints, it’s hard on your muscles, and your connective tissues.  There is a reason that Ivan Abadjiev’s nick-name is ‘The Butcher’. 

I am a big believer that if you are never missing on the Oly lifts, you are going too light.  I advocate (in intermediate and above lifters only!) missing regularly.  It teaches you more about your flaws than anything else, and it confers great mental fortitude skills. 

But, I don’t think you should miss on any other exercises – ever!  That’s a lofty goal, that won’t be met.  But, missing on other exercises is far more dangerous.  When you miss on an Olympic lift, you were only under tension for a few nano-seconds.  Your technique broke down, and you dumped the bar.  It’s not something that puts your body under great strain.  It was not a miss at the muscular level, it was at the technique level. 

The same cannot be said of other exercises like front squats, where the action is slow, and your muscles are under tension for far longer.  In these cases you miss because you couldn’t put in enough force.  You strain to put in max force, fail at the muscular level, and something pops …

No fun.  The Bulgarians missed front squats all the time. 

The second is more pedestrian, but arguable nearly as important: boredom.  When all you are doing are the 5 lifts – snatch, clean and jerk, power snatch, power clean, and front squats.  That’s it.  Forever.  You get bored.  There is just no way out of that.  If you’re a top lifter, getting paid to lift, then fight the boredom.  But, if you ain’t … what’s the point again?

Variety is not only the spice of life, it is the spice of lifting.  Most of us really enjoy doing other exercises too.  We don’t want to skip doing deadlifts or Chin ups just because it isn’t directly related to performance of the Oly lifts.  Come on! Them’s fun to do!

Third, the Bulgarian program is not at all good at producing sarcoplasmic hypertrophy – an increase in the fluid in your muscles.  This is the kind of muscle size that bodybuilders have.  It looks good, but it doesn’t make you all that strong in comparison to your appearance. 

But, I say, “who cares?” 

I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess that you are NOT a high-level Olympic weightlifter (National level at least), and that you NEVER will be (neither am I, by the way).  Most of us will always be intermediates.  Forever.  And that is totally fine.  Most of us are doing this because it is fun. We ain’t going to the Olympics. 

So, if we pop out of our weightclass, are bigger than we should be to be supremely competitive, etc … who cares?  While sarcoplasmic hypertrophy doesn’t result in massive strength gains it is good for you in other ways. For one, it increases you metabolism, so it becomes easier to stay lean.  It also looks good.

Let’s face it, this is America.  We don’t like to put the value of function over the value of form.  If a guy has large arms and shoulders, he’ll be more inspired to keep at it.  Similarly, if women notice that their butts and legs are more shapely because of lifting they’ll be more likely to stay. 

Consistency is key.  Paying attention to aesthetics increases consistency.  It’s a fact, and it can’t be ignored in the American market.

Finally, number four.  Most lifters need a lot more work on assistance exercises to perfect their technique.  Remember that when we are talking about the ‘Bulgarian system’, we’re really talking about the top lifters in their system.  You and I are not that, and never will be (at least them’s the odds). 

I like to divide the lifting world into two camps: Divers and Pullers.  Divers are aggressive on the 3rd pull and get themselves under the bar very fast.  But, they tend to cut their 2nd pull short, and so leave the bar out front too much and will miss out front (there are lots of other reasons people miss out front of course, but this is a big one).  Pullers love the 2nd pull.  They got lots of power when it comes to getting height on the bar.  But, they don’t even bother with a 3rd pull. They instead try to race the bar down – and lose.  If they can’t power it up, they can’t make it. 

Over time, each type will get better and better.  But, certain assistance exercises make a major difference (pulls for divers, full-muscle snatch/clean for pullers, etc).  To not use these would be a mistake. 

It comes down to your goals and your level.  The Bulgarian system in its entirety is for very advanced lifters – only.  The rest of us should take from it what we can, but not get carried away. 

Conclusion

I’m still a fan of Bulgarian-ish lifting, even though much of it is not applicable to us.  I like heavy singles; I like sticking to the basics; I prefer frequency + intensity over high volume; and I agree that if you don’t train at the high end of performance regularly, you won’t be ready when it counts.

But, there are downsides that can’t be ignored.  “Take what is useful, discard what isn’t,” said Bruce Lee.  Applies perfectly well here.

References

• Abadjiev, Ivan. “Competition as an Integral Part of the Training Cycle.” http://www.mikesgym.org/programs/uploads/abadjiev1.pdf
• Abadjiev, Ivan. Lecture.  http://www.theironsamurai.com/2010/05/21/ivan-abadjiev-lecture-bulgarian-olympic-weightlifting/
• Drechsler, Arthur. 1998. The Weightlifting Encyclopedia: A Guide to World Class Performance. A is A Communications.
• Everett, Greg. 2009. Olympic Weightlifting: A Complete Guide to Coaches and Athletes. Catalyst Athletics, LLC.
• Klose, Thomas. 2000. “Evgueniy Popov: The Bulgarian Buffalo.” MILO: A Journal for Serious Strength Athletes. Vol 8, Number 1. pp. 98 – 103.
• Strossen, Randall J.. 1999. “Bulgaria 1998.” MILO: A Journal for Serious Strength Athletes. Vol 6, Number 4. pp. 83 – 86.
• Strossen, Randall J. 2000. “Petar Tanev: A New Passport and a Golden Year.” MILO: A Journal for Serious Strength Athletes.  Vol 8, Number 1. pp. 118 – 122.
• Woodhouse, David.  “Ivan Abadjiev + the Bulgarian System”.  http://weightliftingexchange.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=438&Itemid=60   You can also download it here.

You can find some opinions about the Bulgarian methods as interpreted by Mike Burgener, Glenn Pendlay, and Steve Gough on these audio podcasts here.

Who doesn’t love this little-big man.

He’s closer than a hairs breath of a frogs ass to makin’ that jerk.

Check out the first issue of a new online strength magazine focused on Olympic Weightlifting, Strength Plus.  Scroll to the bottom and right click the image of Kendrick Ferris to ‘save as’.  It looks like this:

This issue is ‘inside the French system’.  Oooh, sexy!  It’s pretty massive (70 pages).  It also includes an interview with Kendrick Ferris (they also feature a weeks-worth of his workouts!), photos and commentary from the 2010 Arnold, a cartoon, and a feature on Sarah Roble’s transition from throwing to lifting.

It’s put together by Rachel Crass – Editor; Robert Hall – assistant editor; and Rampant Lion Productions – Publisher. 

From the editorial intro by Rachel Crass:

The first issue is done, and what a crazy ride it has been. When I chose to create a magazine devoted to Olympic-style weightlifting, I had no idea what awaited me. But perhaps my naïveté was a good thing, as this magazine might not be here without it; few enlightened peo-ple would have taken on such a mind-bending project.

Nevertheless, here we are. Weightlifting in the United States has a magazine again and, hopefully, will have one for a long time to come.

I’m looking forward to it!